You are not logged in Log in Join
You are here: Home » Members » Jens Vagelpohl » News Items » FileCacheManager 1.0 released » This prod vs. Apache cache vs Squid cache
Log in
Name

Password

 
Link icon Forgot your password?
Print

Comment

Above in this comment thread: FileCacheManager 1.0 released »

Comment

Discussion icon This prod vs. Apache cache vs Squid cache

Posted by: gerry at 2004-09-01

Under what circumstances would I want to use this product? If I'm already using Apache for file caching, is there any need for this?

Comment

Discussion icon 1094143086

Posted by: itsafire at 2004-09-02

Apache stores whole pages whereas a cache manager can cache single elements of your page such as a news boxes or other content elements. So when your page is assembled by Zope, it will take less processing time if such elements are in the cache. You may still use Apache to cache fully constructed pages.

 
Copyright (c) 2011 Zope Foundation. All rights reserved. Legal | Contact
If you can read this text, it means you are not experiencing the Plone design at its best. Plone makes heavy use of CSS, which means it is accessible to any internet browser, but the design needs a standards-compliant browser to look like we intended it. Just so you know ;)