You are not logged in Log in Join
You are here: Home » Members » runyaga » ZopeFAQs » ZopeInCommercialWorld » wikipage_view

Log in
Name

Password

 
 
FrontPage »

ZopeInCommercialWorld

Case Studies for ZOPE is a good reference, obviously :)

runyaga

Here is my experience: We used a very modified form of the Portal Toolkit, so that members (employees) could login and edit content that was appropriate to their "grouping". It had very basic workflow (using the ZCatalog? and attributes of the content) so that editors could proof the content and then approve it. After approval it would then be shipped out in XML to the webservers, notify the servlets of an update and then be transformed into html to be included at next page request. Works great!

The biggest obstacle, in my company was of political nature and partnerships. We now use Teamsite (written in Perl) on our larger projects, strictly because of our relationship to Interwoven. Technically, I would say it usually takes longer to implement a Teamsite solution than it would with a ZOPE custom solution. Expense-wise Teamsite is much more expensive - to do most of the things ZOPE does out-of-the-box costs ~$70k. I hope to write a Comparison of Teamsite and ZOPE after my project ends. If you have a group of programmers who know neither, Teamsite or ZOPE. And you have limited funds (all should go into sink redundancy of hardware :) - ZOPE seems to me the more enjoyable to program on the two platforms. Also there is a significant community built around ZOPE - Teamsite is based strictly around consulting, so its very close-sourced and tight-lipped.